The European Union has reached a historic agreement on hate speech and misinformation

On April 23, the European Union (EU) reached a landmark agreement to combat hate speech, disinformation, and other harmful content online, which will force big tech companies to police themselves more rigorously, make it easier for users to report issues, and empower regulators to fine noncompliance with billions of dollars. 

In the early hours of Saturday, European Union officials reached an agreement in principle on the final details of the Digital Services Act (DSA), which will overhaul the digital rulebook for 27 countries and cement Europe’s reputation as a global leader in limiting the power of social media companies and other digital platforms like Facebook, Google, and Amazon.

“With the DSA, the era of huge online platforms acting as though they’re ‘too big to care’ is over.” “Thierry Breton, the EU’s Internal Market Commissioner, stated. Margrethe Vestager, vice-president of the European Commission, added: “We ensure that platforms are held accountable for the risks their services potentially pose to society and citizens with today’s agreement.”

The act is the EU’s third major regulation aimed at the tech industry, a stark contrast to the United States, where Silicon Valley lobbyists have generally succeeded in keeping federal politicians away.

Despite the fact that the Justice Department and the Federal Trade Commission have initiated major antitrust lawsuits against Google and Facebook, Congress remains politically divided on issues such as competition, online privacy, and disinformation.

The EU’s new laws, which aim to protect internet users and their “basic rights online,” should hold tech corporations more responsible for user-generated information magnified by their platforms’ algorithms. Mr. Breton stated that their laws will be backed up by plenty of sticks.

“It entrusts the Commission with supervising very big platforms, including the ability to impose an effective and dissuasive penalty of up to 6% of worldwide revenue or even a ban on operating in the EU single market if major breaches occur repeatedly,” he said.

European Union Parliament and member states have struck a provisional agreement

The EU Parliament and member states have struck a provisional agreement. It still needs to be approved by those institutions, but it shouldn’t be a political issue. “The DSA represents a complete shift in technology regulation.” It’s the first big attempt to establish norms and standards for algorithmic systems in digital media markets,” said Ben Scott, the executive director of advocacy group Reset and a former tech policy assistant to Hillary Clinton.

Negotiators hoped to reach an agreement before the French elections on Sunday. Different positions on digital content could be staked out by a new French government.

After Russia was proven to have exploited social media platforms to try to sway the 2016 U.S. Presidential election, the necessity for more effective regulation of Big Tech became even more apparent. Disinformation has only gotten worse since tech giants like Facebook and Twitter committed to cracking down on it. During the epidemic, health misinformation flourished, and firms were sluggish to respond, finally cracking down after years of permitting anti-vaccine misinformation to flourish on their platforms.

Governments would be able to ask corporations to remove a wide range of illegal materials under the EU rules, including information that supports terrorism, child sexual abuse, hate speech, and commercial fraud. Users of social media platforms like Facebook and Twitter would need to be able to flag such content in a “simple and effective way” so that it could be deleted quickly. For shady products like counterfeit footwear or dangerous toys, online retailers like Amazon would have to do the same.

These solutions will be standardized so that they may function on any online platform. The tech behemoths have been working hard in Brussels to weaken EU regulations.

Google stated that it is looking forward to “working with policymakers

In a statement released on Friday, Google stated that it is looking forward to “working with policymakers to get the remaining technical issues correct to guarantee the law works for everyone.” Amazon linked to a blog post from last year in which it stated that it supported actions that improve online service confidence. Requests for comment were not returned by Facebook, while Twitter declined to comment.

Those targeted at minors, as well as ads targeted at individuals based on their gender, race, or sexual orientation, would be prohibited under the Digital Services Act. It would also prohibit firms from using deceptive strategies to persuade people to do things they didn’t plan to do, such as signing up for services that are simple to sign up for but difficult to cancel. Tech companies would have to conduct annual risk assessments of their platforms to demonstrate that they are making progress in reducing these practices.

Regulators have had no access to Google, Facebook, and other popular services’ inner workings until recently. However, under the new rule, firms will be required to be more transparent and give information on content-moderation efforts to authorities and independent researchers. This might include requiring YouTube to hand up information on whether its recommendation algorithm has been steering users to more Russian propaganda than usual.

The European Commission is likely to hire more than 200 more employees to enforce the new laws. To pay for it, IT companies will be assessed a “supervisory fee,” which, depending on the talks, could be as high as 0.1 percent of their yearly global net income. Experts predict that the new restrictions would prompt governments in other countries to adopt similar regulations and that IT corporations will be pressured to extend the standards beyond the European Union’s boundaries.

“If Joe Biden stands at the platform and says, ‘By golly, why don’t American consumers deserve the same safeguards that Google and Facebook provide to European consumers,’ it will be impossible for those businesses to resist the application of the same regulations” abroad, according to Mr. Scott.

But, according to Zach Meyers, a senior research researcher at the Centre for European Reform, the corporations are unlikely to do so voluntarily. There is simply too much money at stake for a firm like Meta, which owns Facebook and Instagram, to be limited in its ability to target advertising at certain categories of consumers.

“I cannot imagine the big internet businesses applying these standards freely outside of the European Union,” Mr. Meyers predicted.

Last month, the EU secured a separate agreement on the so-called Digital Markets Act, a regulation aimed at limiting internet giants’ market clout and requiring them to treat smaller competitors fairly.

In 2018, the European Union’s General Data Protection Regulation established a global standard for data privacy protection, despite criticism that it was ineffective in influencing tech corporations’ conduct. The fact that a company’s principal privacy regulator is in the nation where its European head office is located, which for most internet companies in Ireland, is at the root of the problem.

Hundreds of data-privacy inquiries have been launched in Ireland, but just a few have resulted in judgments. Critics claim that understaffing is to blame, while the Irish regulator claims that the cases are difficult and time-consuming.

Officials from the European Union say they’ve learned from their mistakes and will make the bloc’s executive Commission the enforcer of the Digital Services Act and the Digital Markets Act.

Share This:

Leave a Comment